Student and Family Information Taskforce
| Chair | Loren Crabtree | Chancellor | University of Tennessee System |
| Linda Bennett | Provost & Vice President for Academic Affairs | University of Southern Indiana | |
| Daniel Bradley | President | Fairmont State University | |
| Richard Cost | President | University of Maine at Fort Kent | |
| Beverly Edmond | Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs | Alabama A&M University | |
| Dennis Hengstler | Assistant Vice Chancellor for Planning and Analysis | University of California -Berkeley | |
| Richard Howard | Director-University- wide, Office of Institutional Research | University of Minnesota | |
| Bonita Jacobs | Vice President for Student Development | University of North Texas | |
| Scott Olson | Provost & Vice President for Academic Affairs | Minnesota State University, Mankato | |
| Margaret Roark | Senior Student Services Coordinator | University of Wisconsin Extension | |
| Teri Thill | Institutional Researcher | University of Wisconsin – La Crosse | |
| Lori Varlotta | Vice President for Student Affairs | California State University, Sacramento |
Task Force Charge
1. Examine the 1996 reports of the AASCU, AACC and NASULGC Joint Commission on Accountability Reporting (JCAR) and the AAU data task force.
2. Tentatively identify the data elements to be included in the student and parent information data set using as a touchstone the following question: “What
information would be most helpful to prospective students and their parents in deciding which university best fits their educational wants and needs?”
a. Review the literature on college/university selection to determine which data elements critical to the selection decision must be included in the data set.3. Decide specifically how cost of attendance data should be reflected in the data set. Make these decisions for both list prices and net prices. Examine the possibility of having each campus include a “net price calculator” to provide estimates to students of varying ability to pay about their cost of attendance.
b. Empanel focus groups of students and parents as needed to test the initial determinations about data that should be included in VSA.
4. Decide how time to degree, graduation rates and “success” rates should be defined and reported in the data set. Where existing information is not available to make the ideal measurement, identify that deficiency and decide what measurements should be included based upon the available data. Again, the AAU data task force and JCAR may provide useful guidance.
5. Examine the logistic and financial feasibility of including each element in the data set and exclude data elements if they prove not to be feasible to include.
6. Develop the final listing of each element to be included in the VSA Student and Parent Data set by each participating university.
7. Define each element so that it will be measured in the same fashion on each campus and its measurement will be transparent to all. Where possible utilize the definitions chosen by the AAU data taskforce and/or JCAR.
8. Develop uniform reporting formats for the student and parent information.

