![]() |
Request
for Applications
|
|
||||||||
| |
||||||||||
| 2006
Request for Applications |
||||||
| U.S.-Mexico Training, Internships, Exchanges, and Scholarships (TIES) Partnership Initiative TIES Phase II/Cycle 2 Date Issued: March 7, 2006 HED anticipates making ten (10) awards of up to $300,000 each, incrementally funded at $100,000 per year over a three-year period, contingent on USAID funding.
|
||||||
|
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) awarded a Leader with Associate Cooperative Agreement in September 2005 to the American Council on Education (ACE), with the American Association of Community Colleges (AACC), the American Association of State Colleges and Universities (AASCU), the Association of American Universities (AAU), the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities (NAICU), and the National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges (NASULGC). The agreement (AEG-A-00-05-00007-00) is sponsored by USAID’s Bureau for Economic Growth, Agriculture and Trade, Office of Education, and administered by the Higher Education for Development (HED) office, successor to the Association Liaison Office for University Cooperation in Development (ALO). USAID’s historic partnership and collaboration with the higher education community has repeatedly demonstrated that institutions of higher education are important engines of development, economic growth, good governance, and healthy societies. The community’s contributions in the areas of training, applied research, program evaluation, policy analysis, and program implementation have been critical to USAID’s portfolio. USAID has provided economic and humanitarian assistance worldwide for more than 40 years. For more information on USAID, click here.
Meetings between President George W. Bush and President Vicente Fox have focused on an emerging common development agenda between the United States and Mexico. In 2001, Presidents Bush and Fox inaugurated the Partnership for Prosperity, a key bilateral initiative, which focuses on promoting economic growth and higher living standards for the citizens of both nations. In this public-private alliance, both governments act as facilitators to leverage private sector expertise and resources to address shared development goals. The presidents stated that Partnership for Prosperity will, “help unfetter the economic potential of every citizen, so each may contribute fully to narrowing the economic gaps between and within our societies.” The Training, Internships, Exchanges and Scholarships (TIES) initiative is an important component of the Partnership for Prosperity. USAID/Mexico, along with other sectors of the U.S. Embassy in Mexico, developed the TIES initiative to respond to goals set by Presidents Bush and Fox. TIES seeks mutual, fully collaborative relationships between Mexican and U.S. higher education institutions and their public and private sector partners on both sides of the border. TIES enhances the capacity of higher education institutions of both nations to examine mutual development problems, work in strategic alliances to develop solutions, and assist Mexico in benefiting more broadly from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Training from these institutions will give Mexican participants the skills and the collaborative links necessary for them to respond more effectively to development challenges and opportunities. Development of human capital is vital to strengthening Mexico’s competitiveness in the world market. Higher education partnerships are a vital means to strengthen Mexico’s current and future workforce and to respond to the opportunities offered by NAFTA and the global information economy. Capacity building initiatives that address Mexican competitiveness, target underprivileged areas, and fully engage the private sector, as addressed in the next section, are particularly sought. TIES is part of USAID/Mexico’s 2003-2008 strategy and entails a college and university partnership component, which this RFA addresses, and a scholarship component for individual Mexicans at the community college level. The component titled “TIES Partnerships in Higher Education for International Development” focuses on establishing institutional partnerships between U.S. and Mexican colleges and universities in support of the Partnership for Prosperity and NAFTA opportunities. Thirty-seven (37) higher education partnerships were awarded under TIES funding in Phase I. This exceeds the initial USAID/Mexico goal of establishing 35 higher education partnerships. Click here for descriptions of TIES partnerships. Due to the success of the Phase I TIES partnerships, USAID/Mexico supports additional higher education partnerships in Phase II. Eight (8) partnerships were awarded up to $500,000 under Cycle 1 of Phase II in 2005, for a total of forty-five (45) partnerships to date. 3. 2006 Request for Applications (RFA) HED anticipates making ten (10) awards of up to $300,000
each, incrementally funded at $100,000 per year over a three-year
period, contingent on USAID funding. 1. Economic Development and Competitiveness Applications must demonstrate the following: (1) training responsive to Mexican institutional and development priorities; (2) training to build capacity in eligible focus areas (see above), as identified by the Mexican institution and local stakeholders; (3) a fair and transparent process for selecting appropriate trainees – including Mexican nationals primarily residing in rural, poor areas of Mexico and/or of indigenous descent – with approximately half of the training opportunities and scholarships offered to women; (4) oversight provided by both institutions; (5) the trainees return to work in Mexico within a defined timeframe and to an established setting with follow-on support and monitoring from the partner relationship; and (6) private sector, NGO, and local government engagement in the partnership with significant cost-share contributions. Possible Activities of TIES Partnerships Possible components of institutional partnerships supported by the TIES initiative may include, but are not limited to:
* Indicates program components in which scholarships can be proposed to count towards the total number of scholarships supported (see below). Scholarship Criteria Applicant institutions should propose seven (7) or more long-term graduate-level scholarships for Mexicans (leading to a degree, as appropriate) to be embedded within a partnership in addition to other training, internships, and exchanges. Scholarships are tallied in units of two graduate-level academic semesters completed by single participant; no half scholarships may be counted. (N.B.: An individual who studies three (3) academic semesters is counted as one (1) scholarship; if an individual completes four (4) academic semesters, it is counted as two (2) scholarships, etc.) Internships that are for academic credit may be counted toward scholarships, and summer sessions that are equivalent to a semester at the institution where they are undertaken may be counted toward scholarships. Applicants should propose a fair and transparent process for selecting appropriate trainees – including Mexican nationals primarily residing in rural, poor areas of Mexico and/or of indigenous descent – with approximately half of the training opportunities and scholarships offered to women. Monitoring, Reporting and Evaluation Plan The application must describe a monitoring, reporting and evaluation plan for the partnership that includes:
The cost of the external evaluation must be included in the budget. 4. Focus Areas for TIES Phase II/Cycle 2 Focus Area 1 Economic Development & Competitiveness
(general category) Following are brief descriptions for each focus area.
The USAID/Mexico Environment Program focuses on the conservation of critical natural resources and biodiversity, with an emphasis on watershed management. Guiding the Environment Program is the premise that if economic opportunities are increased, particularly in areas where communities rely on natural resources, then forests, wildlife, and other resources can be conserved more effectively. To achieve the Environment Program’s planned results, activities will increase local capacity for community management of natural resources and watersheds. This will include training in basic business skills and planning, as well as the introduction of better practices for forestry, agriculture and other natural resource uses that reduce pollution and other environmental impacts, create jobs and add value to local products. In addition to working at a local level, the Program also works to strengthen
Mexico’s federal capacity to promote watershed management, reduce
pollution, and support communities in areas of high biodiversity. The
program seeks to create and support alliances that involve the private
sector, NGOs, higher education institutions, and government institutions
to facilitate the exchange of information and to increase the overall
impact of USAID’s programs. Training Mexican students and professionals
at all levels is an important goal of the program. Forestry is a vital, but underdeveloped resource in Mexico. USAID seeks to strengthen the forestry sector, particularly at the community level, in one or more of the following states: Oaxaca, Chiapas, Quintana Roo, Chihuahua, Durango, and/or Michoacan. The program should introduce improved milling technologies and forest management techniques, while supporting the economic and environmental viability of Mexico’s biodiversity rich forests. A partnership in this area will:
The program should collaborate with local, state and federal forestry institutions, such as the Secretary of the Environment’s National Forestry Commission (CONAFOR), and particularly CONAFOR’s Community Forestry Development Program (Programa de Desarrollo Forestal Comunitario) or PROCYMAF. Success will be measured by documented increased benefits to community forest producers through new products, more efficient processing and/or identification of other services with the same or reduced rate of forest impact. Contact to learn more about USAID’s programs in forestry: 2. Water Quality and Sustainable Tourism in the State of Quintana Roo: The state of Quintana Roo in Mexico has experienced in the past 30 years an impressive development of the tourism sector without taking environmental considerations into account sufficiently. This has been coupled with rapid population growth. Within the state, the eastern coast stretches over approximately 500 km, being an area of rich natural environment, including the Mesoamerican Coral Reef, the second largest reef system in the world. Unbalances and disturbances within coastal and inland ecosystems affect the fragile reef system, one of the world’s most bio-diverse marine areas. The tourism sector has been the main driver for rapid urban developments which have exposed the difficulty facing many cities and towns to keep up with the necessary social infrastructure concerning wastewater and solid waste management. The northern area includes fast growing towns such as Playa del Carmen (20% annual growth rate) that are rapidly developing under an unsustainable model exemplified by Cancun. The southern area is less populated and development has taken different trends that encourages low impact tourism and reduced (or at least controlled) population densities, but this is now evolving very rapidly to a high density tourism model. Throughout the region sewage flows into underground water systems and additional pollutants leach from solid waste dumps. Pressure for tourism-based development starting at Cancun and extending south is a real threat for the upcoming years and new planning processes should include environmental education systems for all levels of the Quintana Roo society; state and municipal governments, private sector and civil society representatives. New capacity building programs should include all these factors, improving local capabilities on solid waste management, wastewater treatment, and best practices for sustainable tourism. In response to the expansion of tourism and rapid population growth in Quintana Roo, USAID seeks to promote collaborative efforts that bring academic, tourism and government sectors together to improve water quality and waste management. The program should focus on the state of Quintana Roo, but also consider a wider regional watershed vision that includes Yucatan and Campeche as part of the Yucatan peninsula watershed system. A partnership in this area will:
The success of this activity will be determined by the amount of assistance that the program provides to state, municipal, rural communities and hotels; the number of Mexican students and professionals trained; and by the amount of water and solid waste emissions that are reduced. Contact to learn more about Mexico’s water quality and sustainable tourism issues in Quintana Roo: Jorge Landa, Energy Advisor, USAID/Mexico, jlanda@usaid.gov 3. Reducing the Risk of Catastrophic Forest Fires: Forest fires in Mexico destroy significant timber and other forest resources, impact watershed management, and destroy biodiversity. The complexity and variability of Mexico’s forests exacerbates the challenge of estimating fire risks and developing fire management plans. Mexico needs decision-making tools for fire management and control that will reduce the risk of catastrophic fires. A partnership in this area will:
The success of this program will be measured by increased use of information derived from Mexican examples in technologies and programs to control, manage, and prevent forest fires in Mexico. Contact to learn more about USAID’s programs in forest fires: Focus Area 3 Mexico has a history of initiatives linking small producers to high potential markets in northern and central Mexico. However, in many poorer states and in the south, small producers lack the national and global market opportunities available to larger producers due to low levels of education and literacy, poor infrastructure, a lack of sustainable financial services and other constraints. USAID is interested in making small scale producers, particularly from the agricultural sector, more competitive by improving their access to financial and business development services (BDS are the non-financial services needed to improve enterprise opportunities -- e.g. production assistance, product design, product-specific market information and ICT services). Without access to sustainable finance, many small producers and micro and small entrepreneurs (MSE) in rural areas remain stuck in low investment/low return production cycles. Without access to market-driven BDS, they lack the skills, knowledge and information to take advantage of new market opportunities.
Both financial institutions (e.g., microfinance institutions, credit unions, banks) and private value chain actors (e.g., buyers, processors, producer groups, or input suppliers), supply finance to small producers. However, due to high transaction costs and high perceived risk for financial institutions, the predominant source of finance for agricultural production is often agribusiness enterprises with direct links to and vested interest in agricultural producers. USAID seeks innovative ways of building on these existing relationships in order to help financial institutions to broaden the array of financial instruments available to small farmers and rural entrepreneurs. Partnerships should identify, document, and pilot successful and innovative models of integrating small farmers and rural non-agricultural micro and small entrepreneurs (MSEs) into high potential markets by improving their access to sustainable financial services, in one or more of the following states: Oaxaca, Guerrero, Chiapas, Tabasco, Michoacan, and the highland areas of Puebla. The partnerships should focus on the links between financial services and value chain competitiveness with specific attention to ensuring benefits for low-income small producers and rural MSEs. A partnership in this area will:
Applications should demonstrate an understanding of value chains and value chain finance, as outlined in the USAID documents, “Value Chain Approach to Poverty Reduction: Equitable Growth in Today’s Global Economy” and “Value Chain Finance - RAFI Note # 2”. Both documents can be downloaded at www.microlinks.org/RAF: Contact to learn more about USAID’s programs in Development Finance:
2. Strengthening Competitiveness of Small Scale Producers In order to remain competitive in increasingly national and global markets, small scale producers need to diversify, add value to their products and seek opportunities in special niche markets. This requires access to a wide range of information on markets, prices and new production techniques. Universities, in partnership with other actors (private sector, NGOs, and government), can support the agricultural sector by providing or facilitating access to a wide range of sustainable business services, including technical and market information. A partnership in this area will:
Contact to learn more about rural development and economic growth issues:
Focus Area 4 Governance 1. Improving Quality through Customer Satisfaction. One of the goals of NAFTA and the Partnership for Prosperity, has been to improve the competitiveness of the Mexican economy. Several Mexican universities have founded Quality Centers that focus on quality improvement programs as a way to stimulate economic growth and competitiveness. U.S. academics have found a link between competitiveness of businesses and customer satisfaction. They have also found that public service delivery can be dramatically improved with a focus on customer satisfaction. A partnership in this area will:
2. Regulations and Competitive Business Advantage: While the political debate on structural reforms continues in Mexico, municipal and state governments have recognized that over-regulation can choke economic growth. Many governments have begun to work with business owners to see how they can stimulate investment by improving the regulatory climate in their areas. North American, Eastern European and Asian countries are pioneering how they can assure regulatory outcomes like clean water and air while maintaining a competitive business advantage and improving their competitiveness rankings on international indices. Much can be learned from these success stories. A partnership in this area will:
Contact to learn more about Mexico’s governance issues:
Legal Education: Mexico is undergoing a profound change in the criminal justice system. During the past year, Mexico initiated the transition from a written, inquisitorial system, in which judges decide cases based on reading documentary evidence, to an adversarial system centered on oral arguments by prosecutors and defense attorneys. The Federal Congress, several state governments (e.g., Chihuahua, Nuevo Leon, Oaxaca, Jalisco, Zacatecas, and Tamaulipas), and the Assembly of the Federal District of Mexico are currently developing, drafting and debating criminal justice reform proposals. The State of Nuevo Leon has already passed an initial phase of reforms to the state code of criminal procedure which incorporates oral adversarial proceedings. More states are expected to pass criminal justice reforms in 2006 continuing and building the momentum of this trend. As a result of these reforms, law schools throughout Mexico are interested in developing new legal education programs that will prepare the next generation of lawyers to practice law in the new oral, adversarial justice systems of the country. USAID is seeking up to two (2) new partnerships to address legal education. Each will introduce specialized training programs that incorporate the art of drafting codes of criminal procedures and strengthening oral trial advocacy skills in the designated jurisdictions in Mexico. In the case of Oaxaca the partnership will specifically focus on encouraging indigenous law graduates to provide legal services in their communities of origin to help overcome cultural and linguistic barriers to accessing the justice system.
2. Partnership promoting access to justice and representation in indigenous communities in Oaxaca Oaxaca is the most ethnically and linguistically diverse state in Mexico. There is a strong need both to prepare indigenous law students in Oaxaca and provide a support network so that they can return to their communities and provide professional legal assistance. Access to justice for the indigenous population in Oaxaca is necessary to reduce the numbers of human rights violations in the state. The partnership promoting legal education and indigenous representation in Oaxaca will:
3. Mental Health Services to Crime Victims Situated just across the U.S.-Mexico border from El Paso, Texas, Ciudad Juárez is the subject of intense focus. Over 370 young women have been killed here and in Ciudad Chihuahua since 1993. Investigations into these crimes at times have been incomplete, with weak or absent evidence, and instances where the disposition of remains is unknown or questioned. The need for mental health support for victim’s families is acute. A partnership in this area will:
4. Forensic Science & DNA Analysis. The governments of the States of Chihuahua and Oaxaca have expressed their commitment to addressing violent crime. Most of these crimes have not been fully investigated, nor have the latest DNA technology and forensic science techniques been used to identify the victims. The State of Chihuahua recently announced plans to improve training for personnel responsible for the collection and handling of evidence, and to improve the forensic analysis capacity of the state-run DNA laboratory. The State of Oaxaca currently has no capacity for forensic investigation and analysis. A partnership under this program area will:
Contact to learn more about Mexico’s Rule of Law issues:
USAID works with Mexico on the prevention and control of two important
public health challenges for both the United States and Mexico: Tuberculosis
and HIV/AIDS. There is also an interest in supporting collaboration on
health issues such as infectious disease surveillance and preparedness
to address such potential threats as avian influenza or other human flu
pandemic, prevention of accidents and injury, reducing obesity and diabetes,
and improving opportunities for people with disabilities. The TIES university
partnerships fulfill a key role in the health program by promoting bi-national
collaboration on mutual health concerns and issues, developing and improving
professional skills and capabilities, forging links between academia and
health systems, and facilitating the application of academic knowledge
and research to community needs, with the potential for improved information,
policies, and services. Support a university partnership in a Mexican border state to develop
a program in accident and injury prevention in the U.S.-Mexican border
region that will address 1) household, 2) automotive/pedestrian, and 3)
occupational safety, with special emphasis on the promotion of a “culture
of prevention and safety” at the community and family level.
Application Format Use the Application Checklist to ensure you have included all necessary elements. Please provide the contents of the application in the following order: 1. Title Page (Please complete HED form in full
and obtain signatures of authorized officials.) 3. Abstract (not to exceed 3 typed, double-spaced pages, 12-point font, 1-inch margins) 4. Narrative (not to exceed 20 typed, double-spaced pages, 12-point font, 1-inch margins) Address the criteria listed in Application Review Guidelines I-VI (see below). 5. Appendices (Attachments beyond the stated appendices will not be read nor taken into consideration):
Applications must be received at HED by 5:00PM, Eastern Daylight Time (EDT), June 2, 2006. Faxed or electronically transmitted applications will not be accepted. All elements of the application must be received by the deadline. Faxed copies of the application title page and letters that include all necessary signatures may be used as a placeholder in the application, provided signed originals are received at HED within seven (7) calendar days of the deadline. NOTE: HED has a new mailing address. Applications should be sent to: 2006 Request for Applications: TIES Phase II/2 Higher Education for Development Applicants should submit the original application plus seven (7) hard copies of the complete application package containing title page, abstract, table of contents, narrative, and appendices (all on loose-leaf paper, clipped together — no three-ring binders, staples, or plastic bindings), and a diskette or CD (with files saved as Microsoft Word/Excel for PC) containing the entire application, including all budget forms, budget narrative, and other appendices. Once an application has been received, there is to be no contact with the HED program office until the completion of the peer review process in order to ensure fairness to all parties concerned. Applications will be reviewed by panels comprised of higher education and international development experts and a representative of USAID. Awards will be made on the basis of reviewers’ recommendations of merit, and USAID concurrence. Peer review of applications is slated for June 2006. Letters of communication from members of the U.S. Congress in support of an application are discouraged as these may be thought to prejudice the peer-review process. Such letters will not be forwarded to peer reviewers. Notification about awards is expected following the completion of peer review. Upon final announcement of awards, the person named in the application as partnership director may submit a written request for copies of the peer reviewers’ scores for the application. No personal reviews will be granted, and no comparative score tabulations will be shared. Peer reviewers will use the following criteria to evaluate the applications: I. Strategic Objective and Focus (15 points) Soundness of case made for addressing an identified strategic objective and development focus, outlined in the RFA, which contributes to increased and more equitable long-term growth and competitiveness of Mexico. II. Partnership Design and Potential Results (25 points) Coherence, appropriateness, and feasibility of the partnership; appropriateness of activities implemented with new and proven approaches and techniques; probability that programs will enhance curriculum, research and service to the private and public sectors as well as Mexican communities; well-conceived implementation plan and timetable; and overall likelihood of achieving significant development results. III. Scholarships and Training (25 points) Quality of master’s degree training and/or other training/research to enable Mexicans to take advantage of opportunities created under NAFTA and the Partnership for Prosperity, and fit of master’s degree program within an institutional framework; extent to which partner institutions provide oversight of training and plan for trainees to return to Mexico within a defined timeframe and to an established setting with follow-on support and monitoring from the partner relationship; number (7 or more) of graduate level scholarships for two academic semesters of training (leading to a degree, as appropriate); demonstrated relevance of the training to assist partner institutions directly address the development issue they have identified; a fair and transparent process to select scholarship and training recipients – including Mexican nationals primarily residing in rural, poor areas of Mexico and/or of indigenous descent – with approximately half of the training opportunities and scholarships offered to women. IV. Partnerships, Mutuality, and Sustainability (20 points) V. Cost Sharing and Cost Effectiveness of Overall Budget (15 points) Quality and quantity of the U.S. institutional cost sharing for scholarships, waivers of tuition and other academic costs, and other contributions from the additional U.S. partners (private sector firms, foundations, NGOs, and other higher education institutions); quality and quantity of the Mexican institutional cost sharing for proposed activities, including scholarships and other programs, and other contributions from the Mexican partners (private sector firms, foundations, NGOs and other higher education institutions) to meet requirement for significant contributions from partner organizations; demonstrated cost-effectiveness and accuracy of budget with a clear, detailed explanation provided in the budget narrative. VI. Monitoring, Reporting and Evaluation Plan (10 points) Concise and thorough baseline description of the institution's current capacity to meet identified development needs; a clear monitoring plan that describes activity progress; quality of plan for external evaluation to capture outcomes/impact; evidence of a mechanism to measure recipient satisfaction; evidence of a report procedure for recipients to describe how they will use new skills when they return to their home institution. Total Points: 110 points Eligibility Requirements HED welcomes applications from the member institutions of ACE, AACC, AASCU, AAU, NAICU, and NASULGC, and from other regionally accredited, degree-granting, U.S. higher education institutions. Institutions with current or completed TIES awards are eligible to submit applications that propose distinct new activities that offer innovative approaches to focus areas described in the RFA. New applications cannot simply be extensions of previous awards. HED encourages applications from or with the participation of minority-serving institutions. USAID/Mexico encourages:
The minimum expected total cost share from all U.S. partners is 25 percent of the requested award amount. Reported cost share must be auditable. Non-auditable contributions may not be used to meet the minimum, but can be indicated separately, attached to the budget detail form. Approximately $14 million in USAID/Mexico funds for TIES partnerships has leveraged over $17 million in cost share contributions. USAID/Mexico encourages similar commitments from TIES Phase II Cycle 2 partnerships. Both the quality and the quantity of cost sharing and other contributions proposed in the application will be taken into account by the peer reviewers. Partnerships among higher education institutions with private sector partners including non-traditional partnerships are encouraged. Applicants should itemize all cost sharing, including waivers of tuition and other academic costs, faculty release time, stipends, professional development funds, internship value, travel, supplies, equipment, other direct costs, indirect costs, etc. Cash and in-kind contributions will be accepted as part of the applicant’s cost sharing when such contributions are: (a) verifiable from the applicant’s records; (b) not included as contributions for any other federally-assisted program; (c) reasonable for the accomplishment of partnership objectives; and (d) not paid by the federal government under another grant. The awards will be executed as subagreements between the designated U.S. university, college, community college, or consortium, and the American Council on Education (ACE), through the Higher Education for Development (HED) program office, under USAID Cooperative Agreement AEG-A-00-05-00007-00. Institutions recommended for awards will receive a draft version of the subagreements to review. Awardees will be expected to submit a marking plan as part of the subagreement. No HED award or any cost share funds may be expended prior to a fully executed (i.e., signed by both parties) subagreement between ACE/HED and the designated U.S. institution. Partnership activities are expected to commence immediately after the subagreement is executed. Partnership activities must be completed no later than August 2009. Award funds for the partnership will be disbursed to the designated U.S. university, college, community college, or consortium, based on the applicant’s implementation of the work plan, stated budget, and submission to ACE/HED of financial, tax, and narrative progress reports. It is the designated U.S. institution’s responsibility to provide disbursements (reimbursements) for its collaborating partner(s) in accordance with the agreed-upon activity schedule and budget. Applicants must budget funds (travel and per diem) to cover the required participation of at least one representative each from the U.S. institution and the cooperating institution(s) in HED’s Annual Meeting in Washington, D.C. or a TIES conference in Mexico during each year of the funded collaboration. (Additional partnership personnel may attend if they are funded by other sources.) To comply with the Department of Homeland Security, U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and Department of State regulations regarding tracking and monitoring of Exchange Visitors, foreign nationals whose costs are paid, fully or partially, directly or indirectly using USAID program funds for training, non-training, and invitational travel, must enter the U.S. on a J-1 visa (non-immigrant Exchange Visitor visa) processed under one of USAID’s two program numbers, unless otherwise waived according to the procedure in ADS 252.3. J-2 visa applications for family members are not supported per USAID/Mexico policy. USAID/Mexico expects that all DS-2019 documents (paperwork needed for J visas) and in-country or third country training be processed through the USAID Training, Results and Information Network (TraiNet) system. Institutions may not directly access the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) to issue DS-2019 documents internally. Information regarding USAID’s J-1 visa requirements may be found on-line at the Participant Training website. Administrators must adhere to the regulations detailed under TraiNet, Visa Compliance System (VCS), the Student Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS), and USAID’s Automated Directives System (ADS) 252-Visa Compliance for Exchange Visitors, and 253-Training for Development. U.S. institutions should allow at least 6-8 weeks for the processing of visas when planning activities in the United States for Mexicans. USAID Health and Accident Coverage (HAC) Insurance Program The U.S. institution is responsible for enrolling each participant traveling to the United States or a third country in the official USAID Health and Accident Coverage (HAC) insurance program. The cost of HAC for the Mexican participants must be included in the budget. Partners must submit to HED:
|
||||||
© 2005-2010 Send questions to HED. |
||||||